Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Question\s+about\s+GS\-35b\s+efficiency\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:13:37 -0800
I have a question about the plate efficiency of a GS-35b amplifier. I have built two of them for 160-10 meters, and while they worked ok, the efficiency was not as good as I expected. In both cases I
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00416.html (8,237 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "David H Craig" <davidhcraig@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:51:09 -0500
I see you found pragmatism (real-world) trumps "specs". My in-use 6m GS35b is 55% efficient, measured "old method" with 4400vdc on the plate & <150-vdc drop full-load. 57% (including power added), wi
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00417.html (9,488 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:45:21 -0800
And I'd like to hear more about expectations of what a single GS-35B will do under in-spec operating conditions. Bill's numbers are in-spec at the edge of the published limits. My question has to do
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00420.html (9,872 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: DAVE WHITE <mausoptik@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:38:16 +0000 (GMT)
if you can get hold of VK3ZL I know he's recently built a GS35 amp and did a very professional job of it, so he'll no doubt have some answers cheers Dave G0OIL And I'd like to hear more about expecta
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00421.html (10,711 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:07:14 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Dream on. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00422.html (7,616 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Paul Decker <kg7hf@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:52:32 +0000 (UTC)
Perhaps an 'elite class' solid-state amp will appear somewhere on the market? http://www.thp.co.jp/english/hl_2.5kfx_e.html Paul (KG7HF) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing l
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00435.html (7,631 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:01:17 +0000
I looked at the Tokyo Amp but was turned off by the fact that it is quite sensitive to SWR (1.8 Max) and the Finals are not well protected. 73, Dick, W1KSZ ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00436.html (8,953 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:01:44 -0600
Perhaps an 'elite class' solid-state amp will appear somewhere on the market? Or the Prometheus http://www.dishtronix.com/prometheus.html Clint - W5CPT - (no I don't have one, darn) _________________
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00437.html (8,078 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:15:42 -0800
Thanks to those that replied with the "Prometheus". Whatever the reason, it hadn't grabbed my attention until now. I'll do a little investigation, but at first glance I didn't see any review referenc
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00448.html (9,191 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:45:37 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Wash't Prometheus the mythical god who brought fire to humankind? Will a Prometheus amp bring fire to my shack? :-) 73, Bill W6WRT ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00454.html (8,561 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Ryan Foster <foster.ryan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:32:14 -0500
Thanks, and it does help. I haven't built the power supplies at all yet, so it isn't to late to turn back at all, but I probably won't. The whole topic though really just made me wonder if there are
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00459.html (10,803 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:42:20 +0000
Maybe, maybe not. But it will surely lighten your wallet !! 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00461.html (9,214 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:46:12 -0600
Jim, I saw one of those amps at Dayton. You will need 3 strong men and 2 boys to carry it. Not sure about the control board part count - agree 1K parts seems quite a few - but the overall build quali
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00468.html (11,521 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:50:40 -0800
Speaking of GS-35b efficiency, What is the efficiency of a pair of 3-500z's?? Say in a HL-2K Mike KC7NOA Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now. _________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00469.html (13,893 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Ryan Foster <foster.ryan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:05:43 -0500
I've got about a range of 58-68% with the tubes in my l4b, lower on 80 higher on 10 _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00470.html (9,558 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:13:08 -0500
What are you using for a wattmeter? 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00471.html (10,360 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:32:51 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Are you serious? If so, I am appalled!!!! 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00478.html (9,554 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:40:49 -0600
Yes, K0RU (a psycho high-speed CW op) and I were standing there looking at it. I'd not seen a contempary Alpha and wanted to see "how the big boys do it." While we were standing there, wondering why
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00479.html (10,615 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] Question about GS-35b efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:16:45 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I am crushed, but I will try to pull it together and find a reason to go on living. Pray for me. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps maili
/archives//html/Amps/2009-12/msg00483.html (9,110 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu