Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Plate\s+chokes\s+\(was\:\s+Re\:\s+placement\s+of\s+RF\s+choke\s+bypass\s+cap\.\)\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Plate chokes (was: Re: placement of RF choke bypass cap.) (score: 1)
Author: Vic K2VCO <vic@rakefet.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:06:33 -0700
I've been working on a choke for a new amplifier project. I've noticed some things which experienced builders probably already know, but I thought would be worth mentioning: a) Even if the gdo has de
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00555.html (10,355 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Plate chokes (was: Re: placement of RF choke bypass cap.) (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:14:25 -0400
Vic, Don't put a shorted strap around the choke. It will look like a shorted turn and cause excessive current in the choke which may burn a section of the choke out. Somewhere I read that you should
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00571.html (12,773 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Plate chokes (was: Re: placement of RF choke bypass cap.) (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:36:38 -0400
Heath had no problems with a shorted bottom end in any of their SB series of amps, TX, or Xcvrs. Running a loop up from the bottom may be one way of finding a sweet spot of minimum RF. Never tried it
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00575.html (13,396 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Plate chokes (was: Re: placement of RF choke bypass cap.) (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:30:53 -0400
I have never tried it but I saw a warning against terminating the choke leads with a closed loop/strap. It was either in one of Orr's handbooks or a late ARRL handbook. Maybe on Rich Measures page??
/archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00582.html (14,863 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu