Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Parasitic\s+suppressor\s+resistors\s+\-\s+think\s+film\s+OK\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Parasitic\s+suppressor\s+resistors\s+\-\s+think\s+film\s+OK\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Parasitic suppressor resistors - think film OK? (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:09:53 -0500; Would thick film power resistors as made by Caddock, Ohmite et al, be acceptable in parasitic suppressor service at HF. They are billed as "very low inductance". The TO-220 case would require a diffe; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00706.html (6,701 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Parasitic suppressor resistors - think film OK? (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:33:54 -0500; Thos resistors need big heat sinks Pete. The simple way out is to use 5W MOX resistors and add a bit of C to cancel the XL. I designed a PC board last year for the Clipperton L and should have a 3-50; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00708.html (7,988 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]