Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Panasonic\s+tube\s+radio\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Panasonic\s+tube\s+radio\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Panasonic tube radio (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:23:12 +0000; My dad would be getting a laugh about this if he were alive as he would recall the days when all car radios were tube radios, hi. I have to admit I employ a tube mic preamp on phone and to my ears it; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00201.html (8,054 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Panasonic tube radio (score: 1): Author: "lncarman" <lncarman@swbell.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 14:05:27 -0500; I have to agree with you Rob. Seems to me that a lot of your modern SS stuff is RF prong. Almost all the computer audio systems are affected when subject to strong RF. There's lots of the cheaper AM/; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00204.html (10,218 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Panasonic tube radio (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:10:02 -0700; _________________________________________________________ That's funny. Back in the olden days, audio purists chased after "perfect" fidelity. Now that it is achievable way beyond what the human ear; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00211.html (7,313 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Panasonic tube radio (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:20:22 -0400; Bill Turner wrote: Now that tubes have this cachet among audiophiles, regular humdrum tube circuits are costing 10 or 20 times more than they ought to. That's funny. Back in the olden days, audio pur; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00213.html (7,835 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Panasonic tube radio (score: 1): Author: peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 10:26:48 +0200; I find the older ones (1946 to about 1965)even more interesting. As a percentage, did many more people build their rigs rather than buy? Kits were perhaps more available, which skews the numbers a bi; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00214.html (7,433 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Panasonic tube radio (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 06:57:30 -0700; _________________________________________________________ When I got into ham radio in the late '50s it was more common for transmitters to be homebrewed than bought, especially if you include kits a; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00215.html (8,455 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Panasonic tube radio (score: 1): Author: Jim Isbell <millenniumfalcon@cableone.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:09:40 -0500; In the late 50s when I started, almost everything was home brew or modified Surplus. If you had commercial gear it was because you were either wealthy or had a wealthy ham friend who was upgrading an; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00216.html (9,381 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Panasonic tube radio (score: 1): Author: "Crawfish" <crawfish@surfmore.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:19:48 -0500; The first Handbook I ever read was at my rural high school in north Alabama. It was the 1968 edition and over the next 3 years, it was checked out by at least 5 people constantly, and only one of us; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00217.html (9,431 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Panasonic tube radio (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:51:46 -0400; Luckily, While I was in Vo-Tech, our electronics training included tubes as much as semis. Our instructor was an avid ham and seen we were taught both. We had several tube type, television trainers m; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00223.html (9,103 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Panasonic tube radio (score: 1): Author: "donii@sympatico.ca" <donii@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 21:00:35 -0400; Oh boy..................memories When I was a kid I was very interested in Ham radio. Read a lot about it but was never disciplined enough to learn my code well enough to pass the exam. I was pretty; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00233.html (8,380 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]