Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+OTA\s+TV\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 12:13:58 -0500
I for one will miss the OTA broadcasts once they are gone. They had much better picture quality than this compressed "stuff" we get via cable or satellite. The FCC sold the public a bill of goods wh
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00027.html (9,536 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 17:15:22 +0000
The big winners were the TV manufacturers. People ditching the old tv sets and buying new ones boost their profits considerably. Also those that manufactured the conversion boxes that were purchased
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00035.html (11,135 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 19:51:31 +0200
Bill, boost their profits considerably. Also those that manufactured the conversion boxes that were purchased with coupons from the government.< Where were all those manufacturers located? I'd place
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00036.html (7,028 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 13:26:15 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: You need to get on someone's family plan. I've been paying $10 a month for unlimited coverage for years. 73, Bill W6WRT _____________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00037.html (8,066 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 22:01:06 -0700
On 8/3/2013 10:13 AM, donroden@hiwaay.net wrote: The FCC sold the public a bill of goods when they were promoting digital TV. They told TV stations that their coverage area would double in area. Over
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00039.html (11,607 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 07:02:01 -0400
On 08/03/2013 01:13 PM, donroden@hiwaay.net wrote: The FCC sold the public a bill of goods when they were promoting digital TV. They told TV stations that their coverage area would double in area. Ov
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00042.html (10,429 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:46:56 +0200
Paul digital geek, and I am usually very slow to adopt new technologies.< Like me, but you are more advanced - I don't even HAVE a TV set! 73 Peter G3RZP _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00043.html (6,832 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:28:17 -0400
In this area of flat land farming everyone had outdoor antennas. The nearest station was over 30 miles with three others at roughly 50 to 60 miles. Eventually cable did come into the high density are
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00045.html (10,626 bytes)

9. [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: Ed K0KL <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:33:29 -0500
I recall being part of a group analyzing different compression schemes and the resultant picture quality. i.e. Could you see degradation? This was at SMPTE in late 90's as I recall. One thing coming
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00046.html (6,930 bytes)

10. [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 14:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
We now have no OTA TV at all in this area. My understanding is that with the switch to digital the TV companies were permitted to switch off the OTA transmitters in markets of less than 250k. Althoug
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00047.html (7,139 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 16:29:40 -0500
My understanding is that with the switch to digital the TV companies were permitted to switch off the OTA transmitters in markets of less than 250k. 73 Roger VE3ZI Here in the good ole USofA , statio
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00048.html (7,003 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 14:41:12 -0700
I ran a comparison test on my A/V system here at home. I remember the difference was striking, but not sure how to quantify my results. But it did confirm my suspicion that the Cable/Satellite guys w
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00049.html (8,098 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 18:16:54 -0500
Other than a few digital geeks , no one wanted HDTV. I will STRONGLY disagree with you on that one, Don. I'm a genuine old fart, and I LOVE DTV, especially HD. If you are a ham, you are an original g
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00050.html (9,836 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: BJ VOUTE <fxb1982@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 22:14:44 -0500
Sounds like the plan the rest of the country is on; which is the plan where somebody else pays! BJ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00051.html (9,607 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] OTA TV (score: 1)
Author: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 22:40:23 -0500
My Dad ran a large Yagi at 40 feet on a windmill tower with great success for years. Then came digital. He went from 8 available channels to 3(okay 5 if you count the .1 and .2 as two channels). We h
/archives//html/Amps/2013-08/msg00052.html (11,095 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu