Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+OK\,\s+here\'s\s+a\s+home\s+brewing\s+question\.\s+I\s+JUST\s+DON\'T\s+GET\s+IT\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+OK\,\s+here\'s\s+a\s+home\s+brewing\s+question\.\s+I\s+JUST\s+DON\'T\s+GET\s+IT\!\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] OK, here's a home brewing question. I JUST DON'T GET IT! (score: 1): Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:31:42 -0500; On 01/13/2017 07:54 AM, Chris Wilson wrote in part: /* snip */ I am running it off a pair of big HP SMPS computer server supplies. 52V each, at many Amps. In series for full power, singly for low pow; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00258.html (9,275 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] OK, here's a home brewing question. I JUST DON'T GET IT! (score: 1): Author: Larry <larry@w7iuv.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 08:09:30 -0800; Ron, I assume from the clips below that you are objecting to the use of a big amp on the new bands. Clearly you have not realized the big picture. Given that a 1/4 wave vertical for the 630 meter ban; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00259.html (11,164 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] OK, here's a home brewing question. I JUST DON'T GET IT! (score: 1): Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chriswilson.tv>; Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:31:50 +0000; Hello Ron, This amp is on 136kHz (not running 136kW, that was, (I hope obviously....), a typo! 1kW is par for the course given antenna inefficiency down there This amp is on 136kHz (not 136kW, that w; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00260.html (10,339 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]