Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+New\s+Elecraft\s+Amps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+New\s+Elecraft\s+Amps\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: jkearman@att.net (Jim Kearman); Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:23:39 +0000; A friend forwarded this info, which appeared on the Elecraft and Ten-Tec lists. Get ready for "sticker shock." 73, Jim, KR1S http://kr1s.kearman.com/ _______________________________________________ A; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00374.html (9,071 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: "Ed Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:13:16 -0500; HA...!!! ...And to think that my compadres said that I was MAD for homebrewing a linear around a pair of surplus 813's...! I feel both vindicated and exonerated...looks like the price of being an app; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00376.html (10,472 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:26:13 -0400; Eddy, I'm hoping to start a grid driven, 4 tube with 813's. The price you can pick the tubes up, even if new Chinese, and the other parts pretty cheap compared to others. I seen where you could by a; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00377.html (11,545 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: Vic K2VCO <vic@rakefet.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:50:14 -0700; I know how you feel, but when you figure out how to make a full QSK, automatic bandswitching and tuning amplifier for 160-6 meters out of surplus 813s -- even though it won't weigh 36 pounds -- let m; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00378.html (7,143 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: KD7QAE <KD7QAE@ARRL.NET>; Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 03:04:10 +0100; All, A GS35b needs NO sockets! Also no fragile glass to break!, 1 Tube, microwave oven transformer, some caps and coils, a TR relay from Russia and a meter or two and you are on the air at full power; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00380.html (13,595 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:56:00 +0200 (CEST); What happened to the proposal from FCC to drop the requirement for making sure amplifiers didn't cover 11 metres? Once that went, what is the point of having Type Approval for amateur stuff other tha; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00383.html (7,470 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:09:27 -0400; Peter, They never did do that as far as I know as I've been waiting myself. That's the very reason you can't sell kits now. They do require testing for harmonics to be under so many db's to reduce in; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00384.html (8,943 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: jkearman@att.net (Jim Kearman); Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:42:25 +0000; The way I read it, you can build one amp _per model_ per year. 97.315 Certification of external RF power amplifiers (a) No more than 1 unit of 1 model of an external RF power amplifier capable of ope; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00386.html (8,235 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:11:27 -0400; Joe, I didn't say that our president was keeping hams off 10 meters. What I meant was that they have them to go after the big corporations because of the money involved over the fines. That money goe; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00395.html (13,412 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: R@contesting.com;Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 03:51:18 -0700; The workaround is a piece of cake, put a different Silent Key's callsign on every amplifier you make. ( I got this idea from dead people voting in Chicago mayorial elections) Rich Measures, 805.386.3; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00400.html (9,405 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: Tony King - W4ZT <amps080605@w4zt.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:07:51 -0400; You didn't make it, you picked it up at a hamfest. Right? ;) Tony W4ZT <snip> _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00401.html (8,671 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:11:07 -0500; I keep thinking this Subject ELECRAFT AMPS... will be about elecraft amps.... It has slid from the introduction of my next amp; to the lovely GS35 to disparaging my local political situation. Just be; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00403.html (8,693 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:30:39 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** There would still be the requirement for harmonic suppression, which is pretty strict as I recall, especially in the VHF region. Bill, W6WRT __________________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00404.html (9,121 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: Tony King - W4ZT <amps080605@w4zt.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:45:13 -0400; You didn't make it, you picked it up at a hamfest. Right? ;) Tony W4ZT <snip> _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00405.html (8,496 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1): Author: R@contesting.com;Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:22:55 -0700; Right, Tony. It was apparently an estate sale. Rich Measures, 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.cont; /archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00411.html (8,870 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]