Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Measuring\s+tank\s+Q\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Measuring\s+tank\s+Q\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Measuring tank Q (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:06:45 -0800; I think I have discovered something quite useful: How to measure the actual Q of a plate tank circuit using an SWR meter. Here's how I did it. Please check my approach and let me know if you think I; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00302.html (8,512 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Measuring tank Q (score: 1): Author: John Popelish <jpopelish@rica.net>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:48:29 -0500; Sounds pretty reasonable to me. One detail: You get a slightly more accurate center frequency by taking the square root of the product of the two -3db frequencies. This is the geometric mean, rather; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00305.html (7,529 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Measuring tank Q (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:07:19 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Good point. I changed the spreadsheet and uploaded the new one. It changed the Q 12 to 11.99, and the correction factor to .9195, b; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00306.html (7,365 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]