Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Maximum\s+tolerable\s+SWR\s+for\s+dual\s+3\-500Z\s+amps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Maximum\s+tolerable\s+SWR\s+for\s+dual\s+3\-500Z\s+amps\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Maximum tolerable SWR for dual 3-500Z amps (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:36:39 -0500 (EST); Is there a rule of thumb for maximum permissible SWR for 3-500Z amps at given levels of output power? Say, 300 watts for 2:1 SWR or 800 watts for 1.5:1 SWR, etc? For SSB and CW modes? _______________; /archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00274.html (6,929 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Maximum tolerable SWR for dual 3-500Z amps (score: 1): Author: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:05:31 -0800 (PST); Good question. Most Amateurs today are (in my opinion) way too concerned with SWR. This undoubtedly stems from today's tranceivers using "three legged fuses" for output finals. In the begining, Amate; /archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00290.html (8,709 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Maximum tolerable SWR for dual 3-500Z amps (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 04:36:01 -0800; ** If the tank Tune-C and Load-C are not at the stops, the amplifier tubes will not know the difference. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00293.html (7,393 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Maximum tolerable SWR for dual 3-500Z amps (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:46:20 -0500; At 07:05 AM 11/20/03 -0800, Joe Isabella wrote: I've done it with coax, so I know it works -- just not the best solution. One last thing, you want to start on the high end of your loading C -- if you; /archives//html/Amps/2003-11/msg00304.html (8,576 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]