- 1. [Amps] MKS brand 8877 test (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Barber <barberaudio@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 09:32:01 -0800
- I recently bought a mks branded medical pull. This is my first non-Eimac 8877, so Im interested in how it performs. For the sake of the curious, heres what Ive found so far: I gettered it overnight,
- /archives//html/Amps/2023-01/msg00034.html (8,500 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] MKS brand 8877 test (score: 1)
- Author: gudguyham--- via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 17:49:13 +0000 (UTC)
- Youll experience a bit more gain with the idle current up at 200ma. Add more bias to bring it down to 150ma and compare apples to apples. I personally am not impressed with them as the grid current
- /archives//html/Amps/2023-01/msg00035.html (9,007 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] MKS brand 8877 test (score: 1)
- Author: gudguyham--- via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 17:57:34 +0000 (UTC)
- How much did you pay for it? Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS Youll experience a bit more gain with the idle current up at 200ma. Add more bias to bring it down to 150ma and compare apples to a
- /archives//html/Amps/2023-01/msg00036.html (9,627 bytes)
- 4. [Amps] MKS brand 8877 test (score: 1)
- Author: John Lyles <jtml@losalamos.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:22:41 -0700
- There was a production issue related to Eimac and the two MRI equipment makers who used the 8877. I attached some information here that I got from another friend who worked in the tube biz then: ETO
- /archives//html/Amps/2023-01/msg00037.html (11,387 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Amps] MKS brand 8877 test (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:57:26 -0500
- makers who used the 8877." Here's a chronological timeline from Dick Ehrhorn. It's an interesting case study and a horrid time period for ETO. I know that the first 8877 QC issues predate 1986: In 1
- /archives//html/Amps/2023-01/msg00038.html (9,623 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu