Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+MFJ\s+tuner\s+and\s+SB\-200\s+for\s+input\s+matching\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+MFJ\s+tuner\s+and\s+SB\-200\s+for\s+input\s+matching\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] MFJ tuner and SB-200 for input matching (score: 1): Author: <walnutcreek@appstate.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:42:04 -0500; Has anyone used an MFJ tuner to match the input of an SB-200? IF so do you know the setting that you found best? I'd like a starting point before I attempt to do this with mine. Thanks, Cam WA4JKW __; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00355.html (6,403 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] MFJ tuner and SB-200 for input matching (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:20:17 EST; The SB-200 has a tuned input and such a set up should NOT be needed. WHY? Lou **Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00356.html (6,692 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] MFJ tuner and SB-200 for input matching (score: 1): Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:25:25 -0800; WARC bands? _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00357.html (7,392 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] MFJ tuner and SB-200 for input matching (score: 1): Author: "Shack" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:53:08 -0800; Is the plate choke okay for WARC (17 meters) bands? WARC bands? _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00358.html (7,513 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] MFJ tuner and SB-200 for input matching (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:40:33 -0500; Yes but the pi net values are wrong for best efficiency so dont spend a lot of time tuning and keep the output below 600W otherwise the switch might complain. Carl KM1H ______________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00359.html (8,638 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] MFJ tuner and SB-200 for input matching (score: 1): Author: Tom LeBron <wz9l@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:38:40 -0800 (PST); Hello all, first time posting but been reading for a while. This is an interesting question. My SB-200 seems to have the input that appears to be off. Every time I try to tune, I have to use the radi; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00360.html (7,368 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] MFJ tuner and SB-200 for input matching (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:15:36 -0500; Do a Google search, there are any number of threads and URL's covering that issue along with corrections. Way too much to cover here. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps ma; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00361.html (9,122 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] MFJ tuner and SB-200 for input matching (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:23:58 EST; Hello all, first time posting but been reading for a while. This is an I'll bet you are using an ICOM radio, there radios have a much too sensitive SWR foldback circuit. I have owned almost a hundred; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00362.html (8,902 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] MFJ tuner and SB-200 for input matching (score: 1): Author: "W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 12:46:26 -0600; I have an Icom IC-756 and an SB-200 and have no problems. I even can load them up on 12M and 17M with no fold back. Either I got lucky or my amp is just tolerant of my fumble finger tuning. I'd rathe; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00363.html (9,152 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]