Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Loading\s+SB\-220\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Loading SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: "Win" <w0lz@winlyn.us>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:04:18 -0600
Can someone comment on loading the SB-221 up on 18 and 24 MHz. using the existing band selections. Will the input Z change much? Which band switch positions to use for each band? At the moment I am r
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00004.html (6,304 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Loading SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: "Larry stowell" <lclarks@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:18:51 -0500
I use 15mtrs and it tunes fine. 73 Larry K1ZW Can someone comment on loading the SB-221 up on 18 and 24 MHz. using the existing band selections. Will the input Z change much? Which band switch positi
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00005.html (7,442 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Loading SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: Jay Musikar <af2c@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:33:21 -0800 (PST)
GA Win - 1. Loading on the WARC Bands must be done in the CW/Tune Position. 2. Do not operate the amplifier in the SSB position on the WARC Bands. 3. 17m Band Switch - 15m Tune - Top of the 40m marki
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00025.html (8,077 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Loading SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:00:56 -0600
Use LV position, and why is that Jay? I would agree to get within a reasonable setting with LV and pop her over to SSB... But why do you say stay with LV? BOB DD GA Win - 1. Loading on the WARC Bands
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00027.html (9,154 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Loading SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 15:25:09 -0500
I don't think that is correct either, Bob - I use my SB-220 on 12 and 17 in the SSB position all the time. I'd be willing to bet that this advice is based on having arced the tuning capacitor a time
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00031.html (10,292 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Loading SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: Jay Musikar <af2c@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:45:29 -0800 (PST)
Pete - You loss the bet. There was never an issue with of arcing in my SB-220. The advise came from a number of SB-220/221 users when I asked the same question. The reason given to me was that damage
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00035.html (11,812 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Loading SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 18:28:08 -0500
Plate choke. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00037.html (7,574 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Loading SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 17:52:05 -0600
Hi Pete, Now I will give out a massive warning to anybody with ANY AMP. If you have an amplifier that is PreWARC design and you decide to become a test pilot and fire the unit up on 12 and or 17... Y
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00038.html (11,783 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Loading SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 18:44:38 -0600
Hey Jay, I think you were given bad advice, the filament choke would not be an issue, it would be the plate choke. BOB Pete - You loss the bet. There was never an issue with of arcing in my SB-220. T
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00039.html (13,264 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Loading SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: Jay Musikar <af2c@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 16:54:44 -0800 (PST)
Hi Bob - My apologies to all. You are correct relative to possible damage to the plate choke. Your warning about the loading of the amp should be heeded. Extreme care should be used and damage can be
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00040.html (14,010 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Loading SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 21:38:13 -0500
AF2C writes ... The difference between the CW and SSB positions in the SB-220 would not be significant if you had a choke resonance on one of the "WARC" bands. A series resonance will destroy the cho
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00042.html (8,243 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] Loading SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 23:18:58 -0500
Jay, the people whose advice you're following are simply wrong. There is no series resonance in the SB-220 plate choke that would affect performance or cause damage in either the 18 or 24 MHz band. T
/archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00046.html (14,128 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu