Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+LK550\-ZC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+LK550\-ZC\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] LK550-ZC (score: 1): Author: Hugh Phillips - K7XM <hphillips@mho.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:41:07 -0600; Can someone tell me what the difference is between the LK550-ZA or LK550-ZB to the LK550-ZC? Thanks, K7XM Hugh _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com ht; /archives//html/Amps/2007-10/msg00251.html (6,126 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] LK550-ZC (score: 1): Author: Gudguyham@aol.com; Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:42:52 EDT; Can someone tell me what the difference is between the LK550-ZA or LK550-ZB to the LK550-ZC? Thanks, K7XM Hugh Usually the difference was ZA was a straight amplifier with no protection circuits like; /archives//html/Amps/2007-10/msg00252.html (6,763 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] LK550-ZC (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:49:42 -0400; The complete Amp Supply product line was an ever evolving beast. A late A model may have had some B circuitry, A B had some C and a C had several production changes. On top of that changes were made; /archives//html/Amps/2007-10/msg00255.html (8,718 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]