Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+LK\-500\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] LK-500 (score: 1)
Author: "Bengt A Jockert" <ben@parabolic.se>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:14:36 +0100
Hello guys Still trying to repair my 20 years old LK-500Z I think the problem is within the power supply. Need new capacitors and I suspect they are no longer available (same size etc). There are sev
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00424.html (6,896 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] LK-500 (score: 1)
Author: dick.knol@planet.nl
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:37:24 +0100
Rich Measures AG6K sells 450 WV 105&ordm;C electrolytic caps for HT PSU use. (http://www.somis.org/Price-Info.html) Please note that contrary to crack, a 105&ordm;C rating electrolytic cap cannot be
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00425.html (7,657 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] LK-500 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:53:57 +0000
A while ago I looked at the ratings on Philips electrolytics, where you can get physically identical capacitors, one family with 85C rating, the other with 105C rating. For the same value, the ripple
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00427.html (7,956 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] LK-500 (score: 1)
Author: John Popelish <jpopelish@rica.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:04:40 -0500
Newark used to carry the Sprague line, but they seem to be getting rid of them. These two might work, but check the dimensions: http://www.newark.com/NewarkWebCommerce/newark/en_US/endecaSearch/partD
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00428.html (8,027 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] LK-500 (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:24:17 -0800
The Matsushita low-ESR, high-ripple-I, 105&ordm; units we stock weigh in at about 80% more than similar-volume older 85&ordm;C aluminum electrolytics. They are 3mm dia. by 50mm long and they weigh 90
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00431.html (9,334 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] LK-500 (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:12:17 -0500 (EST)
I was pleased as punch with the 560uF 450WV filter C I purchased from AG6K. P/N 95 450WV, 560uF; Matsushita P11691 filter C Top quality. About $11 each. Wouldn't settle for anything less after resear
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00434.html (7,815 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] LK-500 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:00:52 +0000
Doubtless thay have different specs. from those older ones. There's nothing in the Panasonic TS family rated at 85C to compare with the P11691. Considering a couple of others, both 560uF, 450V, same
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00438.html (9,896 bytes)

8. [Amps] LK-500 (score: 1)
Author: edk0kl@centurytel.net
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 09:07:05 -0500 (CDT)
Jeff: You don't have to buy anything from Harbach. Mouser has a high current DPDT relay with a 12 volt coil. Wire each side of the line (think 220, but will work at 120) through a set of normally ope
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00506.html (6,824 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu