Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Is\s+Amps\s+still\s+in\s+existence\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Is\s+Amps\s+still\s+in\s+existence\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 16:28:10 +0200 (CEST); This reflector appears to have got very quiet. Have a lot of people left, or does having Rich banned reduce the traffic to such an extent that it almost appears that the reflector may as well not exi; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00047.html (7,115 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 10:44:27 -0400; I'm not sure what happened, but it seems that most of the AMPS activity is now on the Yahoo amplifier group. I detest the way that Yahoo runs their message boards and can only hope that it resumes he; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00048.html (7,639 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 08:02:11 -0700; Still here - waiting for something to argue about. The problem is that if most of the people that have the answers are here, and they all somewhat agree with each other, and there is no one taking th; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00049.html (8,301 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 11:04:20 -0400; Seems to be working just fine. The level of BS has deminished greatly. I'm sure if anyone has a question or problem, it can be answered right here. 73, WA4TT _________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00050.html (7,710 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 16:30:12 +0100; Yes, exactly that. Same here, though all on a smaller scale of operations than Colin. OK, here's a question: any recommendations for a coil former material that can withstand a bit of heat? The 80/16; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00051.html (8,979 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 11:52:21 -0400; Ian: How about no form at all? Can you increase the wire or tubing size and only use a form for winding purposes only -- then remove the form. With large enough wire or tubing, a form should not be; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00052.html (8,032 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 12:24:09 EDT; Ian: How about no form at all? Can you increase the wire or tubing size and only use a form for winding purposes only -- then remove the form. With large enough wire or tubing, a form should not be r; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00053.html (8,921 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: _Administrator <edk0kl@centurytel.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 12:12:04 -0500; Ok folks, time to end this thread. Nothing technical here. Take your discussions to the yahoo list I'm in charge here. 73 .......Administrator (censor....err moderator) -- Sign up and get your 30GB w; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00056.html (8,033 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 18:28:37 +0100; Might well try Teflon, if I can find some tubing of the right diameter. However, in a few months I may take the whole thing off-line and rebuild it as a Pi-L, which should reduce the working Q and th; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00057.html (8,905 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 20:41:16 +0200 (CEST); Ian, What size is the coil former? I may have something in ceramic that would do..... 73 Peter G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00058.html (8,278 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: PA3DUV <pa3duv@planet.nl>; Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:36:23 +0200; How about Teflon Ian? Last week I replaced the toroid core and side insulators of my HF amp (40-80-160 m tank coil) for Teflon ones. So far @ 6 kW Dauerstrich it seems to keep up quite well. Cheers,; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00059.html (10,343 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: Dave G4RGK <zen70432@zen.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 20:08:37 +0000; Ian, We use Macor at work for this sort of application. www.precision-ceramics.co.uk/mprop.htm 73 Dave G4RGK _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00061.html (8,899 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 21:09:47 +0100; It's 50mm OD x 125 tall (2in x 5in in old money) but a ceramic former is very unlikely to have holes in the right places for securing the two separate windings. That's where a Teflon former would sco; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00062.html (8,557 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:43:24 +0200 (CEST); very unlikely to have holes in the right places for securing the two separate windings. That's where a Teflon former would score, in terms of being able to drill it easily.< If it's getting hot enoug; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00067.html (8,840 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 20:42:42 +0100; Thank you, Peter - you jogged my memory! I actually *have* one of those old ceramic TU5B formers. Found it, still packed away from the house move, and it did seem about the right size. Removed the li; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00073.html (9,135 bytes)
16. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 23:17:58 +0100; You all notice how he places that on public record? Very well, then - to be collected at our "local": http://tinyurl.com/netn6 -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK _______________________________________________ Am; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00075.html (8,513 bytes)
17. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 23:27:50 +0200 (CEST); the ceramic... but you're ahead of me, aren't you? I have a funny feeling this "modification" is going to be OK :-)< Then that's a beer you owe me - one for each turn!!!!! 73 Peter G3RZP ____________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00076.html (8,447 bytes)
18. Re: [Amps] Is Amps still in existence? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:53:19 -0700; Yes, it is a great improvement to be rid of the endless childishness. Jim Brown K9YC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/; /archives//html/Amps/2006-10/msg00082.html (8,879 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]