Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+IMD\s+vs\.\s+Vcc\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+IMD\s+vs\.\s+Vcc\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: n1rj@pivot.net (Roger D. Johnson); Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 06:33:11 -0500; ? As long as rotten splatter doesn't go outside the band, it is not against the Part 97 rules. Not True! See Part 97 - section 307a 73, Roger; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00005.html (7,222 bytes)
2. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: Wlfuqu00@uky.edu (wlfuqu00@uky.edu); Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 08:57:50 -0500; And it is rather inconsiderate.... 73 Bill wa4lav; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00006.html (7,867 bytes)
3. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 07:17:52 -0800; ? I have an old copy of 97, but paragraph D defines excessive splatter as that which is outside the amateur radio band in use. If an AM signal can legally be 12kHZ wide, so can a SSB, DSB or an FM s; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00007.html (7,828 bytes)
4. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 07:17:53 -0800; Agreed. However, I know a 79-yr old guy in North Hollywood who does it deliberately in the 40m "Combat Zone" (7250 - 7260). He has an ALC cutoff switch. When a good friend (groupie) is on an adjacen; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00008.html (8,784 bytes)
5. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: w6ru@bak.rr.com (Terry Gaiser); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 07:42:29 -0800; http://wireless.fcc.gov/rules.html ? I have an old copy of 97, but paragraph D defines excessive splatter as that which is outside the amateur radio band in use. If an AM signal can legally be 12kHZ; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00011.html (8,530 bytes)
6. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: w6ru@bak.rr.com (Terry Gaiser); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 07:48:17 -0800; http://www.arrl.org/files/infoserv/rib/part97.txt http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/news/part97/part97.pdf http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/news/part97/ I had a problem with th; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00012.html (9,466 bytes)
7. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: tube_radio@mindspring.com (Bill Weinel); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 10:55:15 -0500; Hi Rich, The complete Title 47 Telecommunication Code of Federal Regulations (which includes Part 97) is available on the web at the the United States Government Printing Office web site at: http://; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00013.html (8,480 bytes)
8. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 16:28:40 -0500; There are multiple rules that apply. First, you can not have any product or byproduct of modulation that extends outside the authorized band for that mode and class of license. Second, you can not c; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00021.html (8,331 bytes)
9. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: w6ru@bak.rr.com (Terry Gaiser); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 13:48:16 -0800; Tom, Where is A3J specified as 3 KHZ please ? Terry W6RU; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00024.html (7,875 bytes)
10. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: hydro@fx2.com (John); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 17:38:51 -0500; Tom, Where is A3J specified as 3 KHZ please ? Terry W6RU -- -- §97.307 Emission standards. (a) No amateur station transmission shall occupy more bandwidth than necessary for the information rate; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00025.html (9,470 bytes)
11. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 15:07:32 -0800; Thanks, Terry. I can find nothing definitive in the Part 97 rules since the bandwidth of a "communications quality A3E emission" is not defined. - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K,; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00027.html (10,339 bytes)
12. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 15:34:48 -0800; ? The fly in the ointment. Congrats, Terry. - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00031.html (8,324 bytes)
13. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: Mike Sawyer" <kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 19:16:15 -0500; Tom said: Second, you can not cause harmful QRM outside of the normal occupied bandwidth allocated for that mode. (A3J means 3kHz wide) I would like to know where it says that in Part 97. I have gott; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00038.html (8,265 bytes)
14. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL" <K4XL@arrl.net (Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 21:59:44 -0500; Since the recent re-write of the FCC rules, I've heard lots of comments like Mike's. In my not so humble opinion, the re-write created problems for hams where none had existed before. While I'm not a; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00043.html (10,739 bytes)
15. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: wc6w@juno.com (Radio WC6W); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 20:56:04 -0800; On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 13:48:16 -0800 "Terry Gaiser" <w6ru@bak.rr.com> writes: Hi Terry, The bandwidth specs are in part 2 of CFR 47. The test specifications are also in the same part. 73 & Good evening,; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00049.html (8,718 bytes)
16. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: w6ru@bak.rr.com (Terry Gaiser); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 21:56:31 -0800; Marv, Thanks much for pointing out where the "real" information is ... although "A3J" is nowhere to be found ... here is the text for SSB (supressed carrier) transmission: frequency M=3000, lowest >m; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00054.html (10,446 bytes)
17. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike); Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 22:01:52 -0800; Guess that means I can't build that 10KHz wide HI-FI SSB rig after all - eh? Mike, W4EF.............; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00056.html (9,412 bytes)
18. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Richard); Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 02:11:23 -0800; Why not 10kHz if an AM signal can take up 12kHz ? cheers, Mike - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00060.html (9,826 bytes)
19. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: garyschafer@attbi.com (Gary Schafer); Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 09:48:37 -0500; I think some of you guys are reading the wrong info. The commercial short-wave broadcast stations have some bandwidth specs but not hams. 73 Gary K4FMX; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00068.html (11,385 bytes)
20. [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc (score: 1): Author: Peter.Chadwick@zarlink.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 16:16:15 +0100; However, there are some limits in the ITU-R Recommendations, which are incorporated into the Radio Regulations. These haven't been translated into FCC Rules - which is a bit strange, since the US sig; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00071.html (8,207 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]