Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+IMD\s+levels\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+IMD\s+levels\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] IMD levels (score: 1): Author: "craig" <craigs99@iprimus.com.au>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 02:17:10 +1100; I would be more concerned with the transceivers IMD level than the tube. The new generation of radios seem to be spiraling down at an alarming rate. Figures of -24 db below 1 of 2 tones is pretty lou; /archives//html/Amps/2004-01/msg00018.html (7,300 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] IMD levels (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 07:45:44 -0800; ** The advantage of the ...J over the standard ...D is that the ...J's filament/cathode has c. 7A more peak emission -- if it is ever needed. The result is flatter constant-current curves, especiall; /archives//html/Amps/2004-01/msg00021.html (7,701 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]