Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Hi\s+Mu\,\s+Low\s+Mu\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Hi\s+Mu\,\s+Low\s+Mu\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Hi Mu, Low Mu (score: 1): Author: "Barrie Smith" <barrie@centric.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:30:48 -0600; Sounds like names for cats. Is there a reason for having high and low Mu versions of the same tube? I know that in AM, for example, a 250TH is found in RF service and a 250TL will be used in the audi; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00650.html (6,785 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Hi Mu, Low Mu (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 05:53:28 -0400; There are a number of reasons for having the choice available Barry. In an RF amplifier with widely varying load resistance, or with class C operation, the designer generally want lower mu. The reas; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00658.html (7,584 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]