Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Hertz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Hertz\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Hertz (score: 1): Author: "The Bowers" <thebowerz@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:49:59 -0700; A few days ago, some guy (HAD to be a graybeard) had the audacity to refer to frequency in terms of megacycles. While this may be considered by many to be a grievous social error, I would remind you; /archives//html/Amps/2007-04/msg00185.html (6,286 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Hertz (score: 1): Author: "Robert Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:20:06 -0500; Best utilized by Dr. Emmitt Brown in the form of 1.21 JIGAWATTS. BOB DD --Original Message-- From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of The Bowers Sent: Tuesd; /archives//html/Amps/2007-04/msg00186.html (7,695 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Hertz (score: 1): Author: "Paul E. Cater" <paulcater@roadrunner.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:49:04 -0400; I'm running a flux capacitor myself! _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2007-04/msg00187.html (7,891 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Hertz (score: 1): Author: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:47:48 -0700; That's kilomegawatts for us OFs. It's been a while since I watched that movie so I don't know if he used it in the 1955 sequences, but the "giga" prefix wasn't commonly used until a few years later.; /archives//html/Amps/2007-04/msg00190.html (8,428 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Hertz (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:49:51 +0200 (CEST); Are 'JIGAWATTS' the result of using that old radio component, the 'jigger'? 73 Peter G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contestin; /archives//html/Amps/2007-04/msg00192.html (6,918 bytes)
6. [Amps] hertz (score: 1): Author: "c." <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:56:59 -0400; It also "hertz" to even use the word. c. / /kz5ca The only time it Hertz is when you touch it. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.conte; /archives//html/Amps/2007-04/msg00193.html (6,733 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Hertz (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Muller" <k0tv@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:34:30 -0400; Any of you who are in possession of old QSTs might want to look up the John Troster, W6ISQ piece on this subject. Very funny.... 73, Jerry, K0TV _______________________________________________ Amps m; /archives//html/Amps/2007-04/msg00194.html (8,095 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Hertz (score: 1): Author: "Paul Elliott" <paab@valornet.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:57:33 -0000; Years ago when the cycle per second (cps), a descriptive term, was named a Hertz, a non descriptive term although in honor of a great man, why was not the liter per second named a Falstaff? 73 Paul W; /archives//html/Amps/2007-04/msg00195.html (7,040 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Hertz (score: 1): Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <mmornhin@gmx.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:47:07 -0400; Hi Dana, Rating frequencies in "cycles" is just plain wrong and nonsensical! Rating them in "cycles per second" is correct. "Cycles per minute", or whatever other time unit, would also be correct. By; /archives//html/Amps/2007-04/msg00196.html (8,270 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Hertz (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:16:21 -0700; What was the title of the article? Seems as if Mr Troster has written many many articles for the folks in Newington to print. 73, Gary...wa6fgi _______________________________________________ Amps ma; /archives//html/Amps/2007-04/msg00202.html (9,503 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]