Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Heath\s+copyright\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Heath\s+copyright\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Heath copyright (score: 1): Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 10:48:34 -0500; I think we should copyright this thread...so maybe it won't be duplicated again....:-) Cecil K5DL -- Original Message -- From: "Sam Carpenter" <sam@owenscommunication.com> To: "'k7fm'" <k7fm@teleport; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00244.html (14,673 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] Heath copyright (score: 1): Author: DAVE WHITE <mausoptik@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 17:27:28 +0000 (GMT); "She then told me the price of $520 for the photocopy. I choked and ungracefully declined the purchase. The company is a military supplier." now guess where your tax dollars go..... Dave G0OIL Well; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00248.html (10,362 bytes)
23. Re: [Amps] Heath copyright (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 10:51:29 -0700; YES! It may come as a surprise to some, but there are people who LIVE by creating things that we benefit from. Their income DEPENDS on receiving money from the sale of their work, whether it's writin; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00249.html (9,613 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] Heath copyright (score: 1): Author: Jeff Carter <amps@hidden-valley.com>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 15:34:48 -0400; Nobody is denying the societal benefit of copyrights. What is being disputed is the societal benefit of eternal copyrights, where all human knowledge/advances eventually become the property of an imm; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00254.html (9,376 bytes)
25. Re: [Amps] Heath copyright (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 13:13:18 -0700; But that's capitalism -- your position sounds like socialism to me. :) But that's not what we're talking about in the case of the Heath manual, which documents a product that they sold (and with it,; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00255.html (8,904 bytes)
26. Re: [Amps] Heath copyright (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 18:04:53 -0400; Yah think that'd work? <:-)) I think it has a life of its own. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00257.html (15,978 bytes)
27. Re: [Amps] Heath copyright (score: 1): Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 15:11:17 -0700 (GMT-07:00); "Nobody is denying the societal benefit of copyrights. What is being disputed is the societal benefit of eternal copyrights," Why is this position different than saying when I build a commercial buil; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00258.html (8,730 bytes)
28. Re: [Amps] Heath copyright (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 18:59:32 -0400; Civil disobedience has a long standing history in the USA. Copyrights should have the same limits as patents. The rest is all political and can be happily ignored by those who chose to do so. Carl KM; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00259.html (10,670 bytes)
29. Re: [Amps] Heath copyright (score: 1): Author: Jeff Carter <amps@hidden-valley.com>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 19:01:01 -0400; Socialist? If I am, it's because I learned it from the American Founding Fathers. I cite the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 8, also known as the Patent and Copyright Clause.; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00260.html (11,226 bytes)
30. Re: [Amps] Heath copyright (score: 1): Author: Jeff Carter <amps@hidden-valley.com>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 19:07:30 -0400; Apples and oranges, sir. We're talking about intellectual property, which is in another whole legal sphere from real property. It comes down to Constitutional issues. I am for strict Constitutional i; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00263.html (9,362 bytes)
31. Re: [Amps] Heath copyright (score: 1): Author: Jeff Carter <amps@hidden-valley.com>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 19:11:26 -0400; Most modern mail readers give the user the option to skip subjects that he/she is not interested in. You should look into that. It seems somehow preferable to telling folks on an amplifier list who a; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00264.html (9,977 bytes)
32. Re: [Amps] Heath copyright (score: 1): Author: Kevin <rkstover@mchsi.com>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 18:45:32 -0500; With all due respect... BALONEY! That's the same logic used by "poor" college students to justify stealing music over the internet. I'd be willing to bet most if not all the members of this reflector; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00267.html (9,633 bytes)
33. Re: [Amps] Heath copyright (score: 1): Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 21:27:29 -0500; Been fun folks but this has gotten way out of hand.... I don't see the benefit to anyone and it certainly does not have anything to do with building and operating amps...and only small impact on repa; /archives//html/Amps/2010-05/msg00278.html (12,174 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 33
Page: [1] [2]