Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Harris\s+amps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Harris\s+amps\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Harris amps (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:26:11 -0500; I am interested in possibly obtaining one of the Harris amps in the RF-10x series. I have heard of people having great results with the RF-102A in amateur service, at full amateur power, including co; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00558.html (6,931 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Harris amps (score: 1): Author: DAVE WHITE <mausoptik@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:45:48 +0000 (GMT); I've heard good reports of the Harris RF110 which is a pair of 4CX1000As (I think). The tubes are very under-rated and although the amp is rated at 1kW out 2-30MHz I'm sure it could do more. It wil; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00568.html (8,446 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Harris amps (score: 1): Author: "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:01:08 -0600; It has a pair of 4CX1500B's, driven by a pair of 8122's. The tubes are very under-rated and although the amp is rated The 2-2.5 MHz band can be re-tweaked to 1.8-2.0 MHz for max. suds across the 160; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00571.html (8,835 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Harris amps (score: 1): Author: David G4FTC <g4ftc@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:41:00 +0000; I have an RF-104 which I use as the main station amplifier. The RF deck is the same as the RF-103 with a single gg 3-1000Z. As standard they don't cover 160m although the 2 to 2.5MHz band position w; /archives//html/Amps/2009-02/msg00575.html (8,862 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]