Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+GU95B\s+and\s+GU93B\,\s+no\s+takers\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+GU95B\s+and\s+GU93B\,\s+no\s+takers\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] GU95B and GU93B, no takers? (score: 1): Author: PA3DUV <pa3duv@planet.nl>; Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 17:56:20 +0100; Does anyone on this reflector have experience with the GU95B and GU93B? Cheers, Dick PA3DUV _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesti; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00215.html (6,128 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] GU95B and GU93B, no takers? (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 00:04:09 +0100; I don´t think so, as a 8171 is much cheaper to obtain and it is well known for its reliability 73 Peter --Ursprüngliche Nachricht-- Von: "PA3DUV" <pa3duv@planet.nl> An: <amps@contesting.co; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00227.html (7,540 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]