- 1. [Amps] Fwd: Weighing In On Solder Water Wash Flux (score: 1)
- Author: STEVEN & NANCY FRAASCH <sjfraasch@embarqmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:18:44 -0400 (EDT)
- Bill: You are using minute amounts of water-wash flux (it is quite benign). Rosin does not work nearly as well, and no assembler uses it. All industry has gone water-wash flush, whether the work is l
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00194.html (9,901 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] Fwd: Weighing In On Solder Water Wash Flux (score: 1)
- Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:41:53 -0400
- I worked in microwave R&D from 1997 to 2003 when I retired.from industry. Never saw water flux at any of those companies. I still have a little plastic bottle with a hollow SS tip that holds the liqu
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00196.html (12,148 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] Fwd: Weighing In On Solder Water Wash Flux (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:44:28 +0100
- For at least 10 years all the solder wire I've bought for assembly work has had 'no clean' flux that leaves a tiny transparent residue that can remain in place - maybe not for high uW or serious QRO,
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00198.html (7,388 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] Fwd: Weighing In On Solder Water Wash Flux (score: 1)
- Author: "David Cutter" <d.cutter@ntlworld.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:31:03 +0100
- In companies I have worked for cleaning circuit boards was mainly a cosmetic requirement and made it easier to see circuit trace faults. It also prevented other debris from sticking to the boards. It
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00201.html (8,817 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu