Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Future\s+availability\s+of\s+3cx1200a7\s+and\s+3cx1500a7\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Future\s+availability\s+of\s+3cx1200a7\s+and\s+3cx1500a7\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Future availability of 3cx1200a7 and 3cx1500a7 (score: 1): Author: Ed Briggs <edbriggs@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:09:10 -0400; I was wondering if it is possible to predict how long the 3cx1200a7 will continue to be available from Eimac. I'm considering buying a new amp, and pondering the future availability of the 3cx1200a7,; /archives//html/Amps/2003-10/msg00205.html (7,053 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Future availability of 3cx1200a7 and 3cx1500a7 (score: 1): Author: rlm <r@somis.org>; Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 07:07:47 -0700; ** The problem with the 3cx1200A7 (and the 3-1000Z) is that it has roughly 7x as much feedback-C (Anode-cathode C) as an 8877. Although more feedback-C is beneficial in VHF oscillators, it can be a p; /archives//html/Amps/2003-10/msg00213.html (8,689 bytes)
3. RE: [Amps] Future availability of 3cx1200a7 and 3cx1500a7 (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:16:46 -0400; ...none of which addresses the question asked! He's **buying** an amp, not building. He wants to know about the likely continued **availability** of the 3CX1200A7, 8877, and 4CX800A, not alternatives; /archives//html/Amps/2003-10/msg00217.html (11,499 bytes)
4. RE: [Amps] Future availability of 3cx1200a7 and 3cx1500a7 (score: 1): Author: "Skram, Helge (MED)" <helge.skram@med.ge.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:37:31 +0200; ...none of which addresses the question asked! He's **buying** an amp, not building. He wants to know about the likely continued **availability** of the 3CX1200A7, 8877, and 4CX800A, not alternatives; /archives//html/Amps/2003-10/msg00223.html (12,898 bytes)
5. RE: [Amps] Future availability of 3cx1200a7 and 3cx1500a7 (score: 1): Author: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:48:56 -0700 (PDT); Any reason why you guys are ignoring legal limit++ from a paif of 3-500ZGs for less than $300?? Some amps will do 2kW+ with these tubes for less than than the cost of a single new 3cx800. Maybe he's; /archives//html/Amps/2003-10/msg00229.html (8,730 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Future availability of 3cx1200a7 and 3cx1500a7 (score: 1): Author: rlm <r@somis.org>; Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 06:52:09 -0700; The 3cx1200A7 is supposedly on Eimac's to-be-discontinued list. Their new 3cx1200Z7 is clearly a superior bottle - unless one is trying to build a 1500w VHF oscillator. On Friday, October 24, 2003, a; /archives//html/Amps/2003-10/msg00231.html (14,031 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]