Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+FW\:\s+plate\s+choke\s+bypass\s+caps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+FW\:\s+plate\s+choke\s+bypass\s+caps\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] FW: plate choke bypass caps (score: 1): Author: "Robert B. Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:01:57 -0600; You would only bypass at the B+ end, you want this choke to think it is 1 choke... The center bypassing would make it act as two chokes. It would be better to wind a single choke bigger in diameter t; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00249.html (8,775 bytes)
2. [Amps] Fw: plate choke bypass caps (score: 1): Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:11:22 -0500; To: Harold, Bob and George who replied. Thanks very much for the advice. I will indeed ground at the 'cold end' of the two chokes. I plan on using two 2720 pfd 30KV 'miniature hockey puck' caps. I th; /archives//html/Amps/2007-01/msg00251.html (6,838 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]