Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Eimac\s+8877\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Eimac\s+8877\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Eimac 8877 (score: 1): Author: "Dennis Homerick" <DHomerick@neo.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:46:35 -0500; Can anyone tell me the date codes for the 8877's with the bad seals. I'm setting on a never used 8609 date code and suspect it is included in the bad batches. Thanks Dennis, w8nw ____________________; /archives//html/Amps/2014-02/msg00266.html (6,231 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Eimac 8877 (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:16:46 -0500; According to Dick Ehrhorn, notta so good. http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/0RLC1aigh5BFLBivur1Y Gary KA1J -- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is a; /archives//html/Amps/2014-02/msg00267.html (7,777 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Eimac 8877 (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:32:17 -0500; Actually it looks like he squeaked by with 25 weeks to spare. That should more than make up for any uncertainy factor. Carl KM1H According to Dick Ehrhorn, notta so good. http://web.archiveorange.com; /archives//html/Amps/2014-02/msg00268.html (8,424 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]