Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Drivel\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Drivel\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: mark bitterlich <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:58:07 -0400; REPLY: Mark, why not talk to the real professionals about emergency communication? The people who do it every day. Go down to your local fire or police department and present your case for CW. Sugges; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00398.html (7,655 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 02:17:32 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I'll say it again: CW ID on a repeater or beacon is not emergency communication. In fact, a slow speed CW ID is an excellent mode for that purpose, but w; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00411.html (7,276 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 03:40:27 -0400; The CW ID on The aviation frequencies certainly can be an emergency communication. Knowing the ID, can tell you where you are located. This can be particularly helpful for new pilots who get lost eas; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00430.html (8,513 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 11:07:34 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: To me, communication is a two way exchange of information. A one way beacon is no more communication than a map is. Both beacons and maps are useful in a; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00434.html (7,473 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: "Mark Bitterlich" <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 14:09:31 -0400; when blood is spilling and things are on fire, voice is king. I believe you said a lot of things, but what I was really addressing was your comment to wit: Relying on CW in an emergency will get you; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00436.html (11,473 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 11:47:45 -0700; To evaluate your opinion (and it is nothing but opinion, based on a religious belief in CW), I'd like to know exactly what emergency communications operations you have been a part of in the last ten; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00438.html (9,195 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 11:54:01 -0700; But - how many repeater users actually understand what is being sent??? 73 Tom W7WHY I did! And they told me that everyone of their repeaters used a CW i.d. Carry on _________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00439.html (7,281 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: donroden@hiwaay.net; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 14:39:33 -0500; But - how many repeater users actually understand what is being sent??? 73 Tom W7WHY dit dit dah dah dit dit DonR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.co; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00441.html (7,860 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: Scott McDonald via Amps <amps@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 15:43:39 -0400; How bout dit dit dit dah di dah on the drivel? Ka9p Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00442.html (8,272 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: "Mark Bitterlich" <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:03:58 -0400; To evaluate your opinion (and it is nothing but opinion, based on a religious belief in CW), I'd like to know exactly what emergency communications operations you have been a part of in the last ten; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00443.html (12,510 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: "Mark Bitterlich" <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:06:42 -0400; Was that "Emergency Communication" ? I think it was! WA3JPY -- Original Message -- From: "Scott McDonald via Amps" <amps@contesting.com> To: <donroden@hiwaay.net> Cc: <amps@contesting.com> Sent: Satu; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00444.html (9,644 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 00:17:22 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: You misquoted me three times. I said " Relying on CW in an emergency will get PEOPLE killed." Not YOU killed. Pay attention. I am referring to the surviv; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00445.html (8,746 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 00:22:14 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: The discussion was about ham radio in an emergency, not aircraft beacons or Navy ships. Stick to the topic. 73, Bill W6WRT ______________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00446.html (8,739 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: "Mark Bitterlich" <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:53:59 -0400; I think we can end this about now. My point has been made, and so has yours. As far as discussions go, there never was one. As far as the topic went, you changed it to meet your debating points, whic; /archives//html/Amps/2017-04/msg00450.html (11,035 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>; Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 15:03:32 -0400; PLUS 1 Mark! To evaluate your opinion (and it is nothing but opinion, based on a religious belief in CW), I'd like to know exactly what emergency communications operations you have been a part of in; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00012.html (12,123 bytes)
16. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>; Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 15:10:39 -0400; IF a CW SOS was not heard by the generally useless ham contingent does that mean it was never sent? To evaluate your opinion (and it is nothing but opinion, based on a religious belief in CW), I'd li; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00013.html (9,544 bytes)
17. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>; Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 15:10:47 -0400; BS. One way emergency transmissions are quite common. -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) The CW ID on The aviation frequencies certainly can be an emergency communication. REPLY: To me, communica; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00014.html (8,671 bytes)
18. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 04:12:39 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Of course it won't get YOU killed, it's the survivors who are in danger from the delay caused by using CW instead of voice. 73, Bill W6WRT ______________; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00030.html (7,487 bytes)
19. Re: [Amps] Drivel (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>; Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 15:37:59 -0400; Bill, find somebody else to annoy, this is getting tiresome. -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) What I said was that using CW in an emergency will not get you killed. REPLY: Of course it won't ge; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00039.html (8,855 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]