Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Drake\s+L4B\s+Transformation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Drake\s+L4B\s+Transformation\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Drake L4B Transformation (score: 1): Author: John Pierce <lumin9@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 11:09:49 -0700; The Drake L4B doesnt exactly transform into an AL82, since the L4B is missing 160M, and missing the Ameritron electronic bias along, with some much nicer metering, and great parts support - but Im a; /archives//html/Amps/2016-05/msg00021.html (10,383 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Drake L4B Transformation (score: 1): Author: Michael Holderfield <mholderfield56@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 12:54:32 -0500; I agree with your thoughts on this subject and thanks for some good info! I currently have a transformation in progress. Using an AL-82 transformer with a populated Far Circuits 4KV power supply PCB,; /archives//html/Amps/2016-05/msg00023.html (13,575 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Drake L4B Transformation (score: 1): Author: John Pierce <lumin9@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 11:15:27 -0700; I'm glad that my information might help. When I started this project there was also some concern expressed that amplifier efficiency would be degraded because the Drake engineers had "obviously" desi; /archives//html/Amps/2016-05/msg00024.html (9,427 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]