Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Damage\?\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Kirkland" <alpha76@triton.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:10:07 -0400
I am somewhat worried that 1500 watts from my old Alpha will damage the electronics in my new car. The antenna is about 75 feet from the garage. Anyone heard of this happening ?. Bob, w5pvr _________
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00241.html (6,802 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Fortra" <fortra@siol.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:21:00 +0200
Hi Bob, you are kidding, wright?? Nermin S58DX _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00242.html (7,290 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:13:50 -0400
Must be a Prius (; Carl _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00246.html (8,490 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:10:51 -0400
"I am somewhat worried that 1500 watts from my old Alpha will damage the electronics in my new car. The antenna is about 75 feet from the garage. Anyone heard of this happening ?" For those who are c
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00249.html (7,972 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Young" <paul@g0hwc.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:30:19 +0100
While on 10m with my Alpha 87A i did cause a problem to my sons car !!! but it is remote control on 27mhz !!! Paul G0HWC Check out my website www.g0hwc.com / www.sstv.org.uk *Echolink node MB7ICL-L
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00250.html (7,670 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Harold Mandel" <hmandel@barantelecom.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:32:06 -0400
It's not your amplifier. It's the power cord to it. We offer a specially-designed, low-emissivity, oxygen-free line cord for these pesky amplifiers, and you will be proud to own one and see how much
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00251.html (8,286 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:32:50 -0700
If 1500W from 75' away would do damage, I guess you better not drive past any 50kW AM BC stations, which are often set up right alongside major highways. -WB2WIK/6 While on 10m with my Alpha 87A i di
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00253.html (8,124 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:07:36 -0400
"We offer a specially-designed, low-emissivity, oxygen-free line cord for these pesky amplifiers, and you will be proud to own one and see how much cleaner your signal will be." Do these line cords h
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00254.html (8,226 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Al Waller, K3TKJ" <k3tkj@qsl.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:16:07 -0400
That's a gret idea but an easier way is to ship that old Alpha to me as a gift and I will send you a nice roll of Amplified Coax. Problem will be solved. Al __________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00255.html (7,833 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Weiss" <davidhweiss@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:04:28 -0500
*I guess this is what we do when the conditions are so bad!! :-) HI HI !! Dave* _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00257.html (9,137 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:06:40 -0700
I have small tins of dB grease available: 1 oz, $79.95; 2 oz, $995; 3 oz, $12,499. 1 oz is good for 100 feet of cable, but for longer lengths you cannot use multiple 1 oz supplies because it must be
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00258.html (8,606 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Harold Mandel" <hmandel@barantelecom.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:32:34 -0400
Now this is no joke: We actually had a T-Mobile RF engineer specify a diplexer with negative attenuation. I wonder what the sweeps would have looked like. ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00259.html (8,522 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Harold Mandel" <hmandel@barantelecom.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:44:47 -0400
{snip} "...specially-designed, low-emissivity, oxygen-free line cord..." Do these line cords have gold connectors on each end ? I am a discriminating buyer and would have nothing less than the very b
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00261.html (9,139 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:15:40 -0400
Actually, this may not be as farfetched as all that - if I remember correctly, some late-model cars are now using ethernet for their data communications between the computer, various sensors, and var
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00264.html (10,522 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Kirkland" <alpha76@triton.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:03:36 -0400
_______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00265.html (8,382 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:08:02 +0100
You people are treading dangerously close to the intellectual property of the Gainiax Corporation. Every roll of Gainiax(TM) comes with a big red label: "WARNING: Do Not Connect Ends of Roll Together
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00266.html (8,696 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: Karl-Arne Markström <sm0aom@telia.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:05:08 +0200
It is very unlikely that modern cars, which are built to very strict EMC specifications, could be interfered with or damaged by amateur power levels, even if parked in the near field of quite large a
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00267.html (10,881 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:17:50 -0400
And we all start running the legal limit on 2.3 Gig mobile, or they drive by an EME station?<:-)) There have been problems with RF *from* cars (The early V6 in the Cab Forward Chrysler products on 14
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00268.html (10,662 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:36:41 -0400
There are only a few that are 100% any where, so that narrows the make and model down pretty close<:-)) As I said in an earlier post we have one of those, rather than the 50 or 60% out of Detroit or
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00269.html (10,613 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] Damage? (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:54:15 -0500
<<<If 1500W from 75' away would do damage, I guess you better not drive past any 50kW AM BC stations, which are often set up right alongside major highways. You all make it sound like the 1-A station
/archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00296.html (8,064 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu