Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Cut\s+core\s+and\s+EI\s+core\s+loss\s+diferences\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Cut\s+core\s+and\s+EI\s+core\s+loss\s+diferences\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Cut core and EI core loss diferences (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:08:06 -0400; Ok, one last word. I finished my research into this as I myself wanted to find exactly why cut core iron losses were higher than EI cores. I figured it was just the air gaps on the two C sections but; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00420.html (10,231 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Cut core and EI core loss diferences (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:47:03 -0400; Mike, Thanks for the comments. I happened across that book after Tom Aldridge and myself discussed the possibility of using a saturable reactor to control inrush current in our amps, which by the way; /archives//html/Amps/2005-04/msg00434.html (15,421 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]