Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Class\s+E\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Class\s+E\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Class E (score: 1): Author: wc6w@juno.com (Radio WC6W); Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1999 13:31:34 EST; Hi, everyone! Does anyone know of a timely reference on Class E RF amplifiers? All I can seem to find are: The 1997 May-June QST article using a non-optimum FET... and vastly exceeding the current ra; /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00041.html (8,258 bytes)
2. [AMPS] class E (score: 1): Author: jtml@lanl.gov (John Lyles); Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 17:47:44 -0600; RF Design magazine had an article on a class E amp for around 10 MHz, single freq, years ago. See below. QST published one recently I believe. Used to be you had to get a license from Nat Sokal and D; /archives//html/Amps/1998-04/msg00335.html (9,668 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Class E (score: 1): Author: "wc6w@juno.com" <wc6w@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:57:14 GMT; Hi Stefan, Class E may be efficient but, as you already noted it has some drawbacks. One you didn't mention is the rather large voltage swings on the Drain (typically 4X VDD) which provides less than; /archives//html/Amps/2005-03/msg00297.html (10,283 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]