- 1. [Amps] Babying radios conclusion (score: 1)
- Author: Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 03:49:43 +0000
- As my msg say, I asked to eliminate considerations of "mfg defects" or "misuse" (and poor design that traps heat, etc.). These matters were what I specifically eliminated in my questions. I wanted t
- /archives//html/Amps/2012-06/msg00126.html (8,395 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] Babying radios conclusion (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:25:24 -0400
- Not exactly. Only half sand...IE, sand is quartz SiO2, The solid state devices are generally made of either Silicon or Germanium although there is a layer of oxide in there. Solid state devices do ag
- /archives//html/Amps/2012-06/msg00129.html (11,985 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] Babying radios conclusion (score: 1)
- Author: Charles Bibb <zedkay@telepak.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:58:14 -0500
- Hey, Charlie Relax. Kick back. Have a glass of wine while pondering the impermanence of all things. ;-) 73, Charles - K5ZK _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@conte
- /archives//html/Amps/2012-06/msg00136.html (7,521 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] Babying radios conclusion (score: 1)
- Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:12:41 -0700
- How to not baby the amp is to underload the tuning - operating it with a big dip of plate current, thinking that it will be easy on the finals. This is a terrible thing to do. High voltage will likel
- /archives//html/Amps/2012-06/msg00138.html (7,788 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu