Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Anyone\s+place\s+any\s+RF\s+Parts\s+Taylor\s+572B\s+tube\s+orders\s+lately\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Anyone\s+place\s+any\s+RF\s+Parts\s+Taylor\s+572B\s+tube\s+orders\s+lately\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Anyone place any RF Parts Taylor 572B tube orders lately? (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <n1miw@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 19:15:05 -0400; Here's my story. I ordered a matched pair of these tubes back in March, one tube failed shortly after installation, and sent them back with the RMA. Replacement was approved (defective tube), but the; /archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00022.html (7,177 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Anyone place any RF Parts Taylor 572B tube orders lately? (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:10:05 -0400; Chinese 572B's are in short supply as the factories make more money running audiophool tubes. There are only 2 factories building them and if you think RF Parts or Taylor brands are any different tha; /archives//html/Amps/2008-07/msg00023.html (8,327 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]