Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amps\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+57\,\s+Issue\s+52\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amps\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+57\,\s+Issue\s+52\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 57, Issue 52 (score: 1): Author: "Edwin Karl" <edk0kl@centurytel.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:27:14 -0500; Re: Amplifier Linearity Does anyone besides me still use a 'scope in trapezoid pattern looking at input vs. output linearity? Seems like we're getting into "flat topping" tubes, etc just to get the m; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00349.html (33,272 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 57, Issue 52 (score: 1): Author: Scott Manthe <n9aa@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:42:33 -0400; Whether or not something impresses you or wastes your time isn't really the point. I'd think someone who subscribes to this list might be curious how someone can get 100-150 extra watts out of an amp; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00350.html (8,892 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 57, Issue 52 (score: 1): Author: "Nils Petter Pedersen" <la7sl@online.no>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:54:09 +0200; Yes Ed Somebody still cares.... I am an old ham (1968) Those were the days were the laws of nature still ruled. And I still have a few nice instruments from those days, --for some reason they still g; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00351.html (37,418 bytes)
4. [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 57, Issue 52 (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:27:08 -0400; What impresses me is that some supposedly educated people have such poor reading comprehension. Maybe it is a form of ADD. Try reading 10 or 20 times all the posts in the thread and associated ones; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00352.html (9,621 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 57, Issue 52 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:45:51 -0400; Not really, because a scope tells us very little about the quantity of splatter. It might be a tuning aid for those who don't know how to tune with meters, but it really isn't a good bandwidth indic; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00376.html (9,975 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 57, Issue 52 (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:04:44 -0400; There is some very good technical information buried in that post Tom. Ive edited it for future use to silence some naysayers. BTW, what is your waist size these days? And you certainly are no youngs; /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00385.html (11,694 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]