Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amps\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+26\,\s+Issue\s+85\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amps\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+26\,\s+Issue\s+85\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 26, Issue 85 (score: 1): Author: K3vw@aol.com; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:22:04 EST; I say the AL-1500 for several reasons. The 1500 has a grid trip protection circuit, the 1200 does not. The 1200 has a neutralizing circuit to keep it from oscilatting on 10 meters, the 1500 is stable; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00705.html (7,016 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 26, Issue 85 (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:27:58 -0800; No grid-trip protection circuit that I've seen yet is capable of tripping during an 8877's 50a or so burst of grid current during an unloaded oscillation condition. The "neutralizing circuit" is the; /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00723.html (8,640 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]