Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amps\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+166\,\s+Issue\s+26\,\s+reference\s+direction\s+of\s+current\s+flow\s+in\s+screen\s+grids\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amps\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+166\,\s+Issue\s+26\,\s+reference\s+direction\s+of\s+current\s+flow\s+in\s+screen\s+grids\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 166, Issue 26, reference direction of current flow in screen grids (score: 1): Author: Gene May <gene-may@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:39:17 +0000; All, Concur with Bill W6WRT re "positive vs negative" convention in describing current. The convention we use now is left over from at least a hundred years ago when a scientist guessed wrong about t; /archives//html/Amps/2016-10/msg00125.html (11,082 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 166, Issue 26, reference direction of current flow in screen grids (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:58:46 -0400; On 10/26/2016 03:39 PM, Gene May wrote: Suggestions by Bill and Gary K4FMX and others to put a resistor from the screen to the cathode, such that the resistor will pass at least the maximum "negative; /archives//html/Amps/2016-10/msg00132.html (9,796 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 166, Issue 26, reference direction of current flow in screen grids (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 16:02:35 -0400; BOTH the imaginary Conventional current and real current are necessary when analyzing some circuits. The Imaginary current makes analyzing a solid state schematic much easier, even if in reality it d; /archives//html/Amps/2016-10/msg00152.html (12,646 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]