Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Acom\s+2000A\s+\+\s+Alpha\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Acom\s+2000A\s+\+\s+Alpha\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Acom 2000A + Alpha (score: 1): Author: g3jvc@jcleeve.idps.co.uk (Cleeve); Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 20:56:55 +0000; I would like to thank all those who gave me advice and comments on the Acom 2000A, from the response, the manufacturers should be very happy...I will continue drooling, and drop some very pointed hin; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00091.html (6,591 bytes)
2. [Amps] Acom 2000A + Alpha (score: 1): Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 14:30:19 -0500; John, Sorry I didn't respond to your earlier request. The equivalent amp from Alpha is the 87A. I have a 2000A and an 87A, using them for SO2R (single-op, two radio) contesting. Here are some thought; /archives//html/Amps/2002-12/msg00119.html (14,880 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]