Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+AM\-6154\s+questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+AM\-6154\s+questions\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] AM-6154 questions (score: 1): Author: Web Williams <kr4wm@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 13:58:03 -0400; I thought I'd come in here begging for an answer, since I have not been able to turn up anything on the internet about an AM-6154 VHF amplifier that I have. It's been working fine with an 8930 for ab; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00225.html (9,328 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] AM-6154 questions (score: 1): Author: <pmills7@houston.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 13:24:19 -0500; You obviously offended the boatanchor gods by putting a Soviet made tube in a US military amplifier :-) good luck, 73, Phil W5BVB -- Original Message -- From: "Web Williams" <kr4wm@earthlink.net> To:; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00226.html (9,843 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] AM-6154 questions (score: 1): Author: "RICHARD GEORGE" <k6kwq@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 12:17:27 -0700; I would have never left it running for that long. This amp was only designed for 50 watts out. You probably overheated the cavity and after you left it off and it cooled down it now is making contact; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00228.html (10,576 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] AM-6154 questions (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:01:44 -0400; Try the following; might help (then too, u may already be aware of these sites): http://www.n1rwy.com/am6155/repairq.html http://members.ij.net/packrats/techinal.htm http://www.n1rwy.com/am6155/ http; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00229.html (11,204 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] AM-6154 questions (score: 1): Author: KY1K <ky1k@pivot.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:00:37 -0400; I read the original post again. When I read it originally, I never thought he turned it on and let it cook at 150 watts over night. But, maybe that is what he did. I hope to run one of these someday; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00239.html (12,284 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] AM-6154 questions (score: 1): Author: Web Williams <kr4wm@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:58:32 -0400; Hi Art (and others), I thought I had been hitting "reply" to the list, but apparently my replies are only going to the person who posted back to me on the list. No, I did not let the amp operate key-; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00240.html (15,455 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] AM-6154 questions (score: 1): Author: "RICHARD GEORGE" <k6kwq@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 06:22:06 -0700; In my experience running for long periods of time has a tendency to overheat the cavity. The supplied fan is to small (and loud) a bigger fan does help. I would not spend money on the Russian tube if; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00241.html (13,539 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] AM-6154 questions (score: 1): Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:26:33 -0400; Web, If it's a solder joint, you'll probably have to open up the hood and look around to find it. Generally taking a DVM and hooking it between the circuit, then use a pair of needle nose pliers to m; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00242.html (8,522 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] AM-6154 questions (score: 1): Author: "Harold B. Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:45:40 -0400; Dear Web, This sounds just like an intermittent contact on a tube-television turret tuner. Remember when you'd be sitting, watching TV, and the picture would roll or fuzz up and you'd get up and give; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00256.html (8,320 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] AM-6154 questions (score: 1): Author: "Chris Cox, N0UK" <chrisc@chris.org>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:23:48 -0500 (CDT); Don't forget that 50 watts AM carrier power is still 200 watts peak. -- 73 Chris Cox N0UK, G4JEC, ex-AB0CN, ex-G8PTC RNARS #1157 EN34jv33 chrisc@Chris.Org Ping Jockey's do it until they HEAR the burn; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00260.html (8,464 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] AM-6154 questions (score: 1): Author: craxd <craxd1@ezwv.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:16:16 -0400; Heck, we had too, our boss, who was the electrical superintendent, made us. They made covered hopper RR cars there and primarily that was done around the shot blast. That was a huge wheel blast where; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00261.html (11,076 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] AM-6154 questions (score: 1): Author: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:49:18 -0700 (PDT); I haven't been following this, so I'm not sure how it got to "burning shorts", but I used to do the same thing with portable cell phone boards. Occasionally, we'd find an internal short in the 4 or 6; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00262.html (11,522 bytes)
13. [Amps] AM-6154 questions (score: 1): Author: JMLTINC@aol.com; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:27:28 +0000; Hi Web I am a bit confused by your posts. In the original, you said it idled at 150 watts, but said in the second post you did not have the Hi-V turned on. These amps are overbuilt, and despite they; /archives//html/Amps/2004-09/msg00264.html (9,817 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]