Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+A\s+CALL\s+TO\s+ARMS\s+\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+A\s+CALL\s+TO\s+ARMS\s+\!\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] A CALL TO ARMS ! (score: 1): Author: ROBERT MARSTON <rmarston@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:50:00 -0800 (PST); Tomorrow the FCC will hold a public meeting where it is likely they will introduce an NPRM which if implemented will relax limitations on Part 15 devices between 2 and 80 Mhz. This in order to facili; /archives//html/Amps/2004-02/msg00073.html (7,511 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] A CALL TO ARMS ! (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-Online.Net>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:50:10 -0600; Looks to me like the 200 max has already been reached. The url is greyed out. Somebody record it or get a transcript so the rest of us can see firsthand what happened. 73, de Jim KG0KP introduce an N; /archives//html/Amps/2004-02/msg00083.html (8,726 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] A CALL TO ARMS ! (score: 1): Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>; Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:23:52 -0500; The commissioners are scrambling to put this into effect before the next election to assure their future employment by the Utility companies. BPL will allow the power company to get into the telephon; /archives//html/Amps/2004-02/msg00090.html (9,798 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] A CALL TO ARMS ! (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:20:09 -0800; Very doubtful, Bill. It's already failed in many places in Europe. The bandwidth it can provide is very limited, especially as the subscriber density gets high (they only have about 27 MHz of bandwi; /archives//html/Amps/2004-02/msg00094.html (9,485 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] A CALL TO ARMS ! (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 02:47:59 -0800; What puzzles me is how does one put 2MHz digital info back and forth through numerous 60Hz transformers? A DSL-telephone line is a whole nuther ballgame since it is basically a balanced transmission; /archives//html/Amps/2004-02/msg00095.html (11,096 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] A CALL TO ARMS ! (score: 1): Author: ROBERT MARSTON <rmarston@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:58:33 -0800 (PST); Good point Rich The point of BPL is to provide "the last mile" of transmission. In this case between the telephone company central office and the end user. There is probably less than half a dozen tr; /archives//html/Amps/2004-02/msg00102.html (11,177 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] A CALL TO ARMS ! (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:24:06 -0800; ** Bypassing millions of transformers sounds more expensive than DSL-telephone service. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c; /archives//html/Amps/2004-02/msg00103.html (11,550 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]