- 1. [Amps] 9913 cable (score: 1)
- Author: "kce" <kce@chartermi.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:51:48 -0500
- This past weekend I was loading up a amp into a OCF dipole fed through a 4:1 balun with 9913 belden cable. When I hit the 800 watt mark a big spark, so I figure ok the 4:1 went west on me. I change o
- /archives//html/Amps/2004-02/msg00058.html (6,942 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] 9913 cable (score: 1)
- Author: Vic Rosenthal <vic@rakefet.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 08:17:12 -0800
- kce wrote: This past weekend I was loading up a amp into a OCF dipole fed through a 4:1 balun with 9913 belden cable. When I hit the 800 watt mark a big spark, so I figure ok the 4:1 went west on me.
- /archives//html/Amps/2004-02/msg00062.html (7,776 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] 9913 cable (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:17:26 -0500
- I see you are using a tuner. What was the SWR after the tuner. Having 1:1 into the tuner does not count. 9913 should easily handle 10 KW. I can run 2.5 KW into a dummy load thru RG58 (perfect match).
- /archives//html/Amps/2004-02/msg00066.html (8,578 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] 9913 cable (score: 1)
- Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:18:14 -0800
- ** Off center fed dipoles need to be fed with ladder-line and a Balanced L-network tuner. If I were building such, I would use #12 bare Cu spaced c. 4" for the feedline, - cheers, Ken. ______________
- /archives//html/Amps/2004-02/msg00068.html (8,125 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Amps] 9913 cable (score: 1)
- Author: "Harold B. Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:32:36 -0500
- Several years ago I wrote an article for Satellite Operator about 9913 coax. It seems that Belden supplied me with a four hundred foot length of 9913 that displayed a high SWR at a particular frequen
- /archives//html/Amps/2004-02/msg00069.html (9,914 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu