Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+8874\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+8874\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] 8874? (score: 1): Author: Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 02:34:57 +0000; about 20 yrs ago, I bought a Dentron DTR-2000 for $800. I figured I bought the tube (which is what a new one went for then) and got the amp for free. It drives so easily and puts out POWER.... great; /archives//html/Amps/2009-06/msg00150.html (8,821 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] 8874? (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:21:07 -0400; The DTR-2000 used a single 8877/3CX1500A7 which is much larger physically than the 8874. I was getting 8877s at the time for $305 (at a discount)and had a number of them (when the DTR2000 first came; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00000.html (10,330 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] 8874? (score: 1): Author: "Adrian Rees" <rees.a@btconnect.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:23:58 +0100; Erm, the MLA2500 uses the 8875 not the 8873. Sorry for being a pedant ! I have never seen a Dentron DTR-2000 and am curious to see the circuit diagram. I must admit I do like Dentron amps, even thoug; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00001.html (11,314 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] 8874? (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:02:10 -0400; The DTR2000L is a perfect example of Dentron engineering or more accurately the lack of. No grid current meter, no grid protection, the 8877 cooled by a muffin fan (later ones used a small blower) an; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00006.html (12,689 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] 8874? (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:06:51 -0400; Thanks for the correction. My mind did a transposition there. <:-)) When I woke this afternoon I was wondering if I'd gotten that straight and the first e-mail I saw answered my question. The 8873 wa; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00018.html (13,989 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] 8874? (score: 1): Author: "Fortra" <fortra@siol.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 21:16:42 +0200; Roger, i would not bet 100 %, but as i recalled, Heathkit never made an amp with PAIR of 8873's. Yes they did one model, SB-230 with a single 8873. Regards, Nermin S58DX -- Original Message -- From:; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00020.html (15,602 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] 8874? (score: 1): Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:57:09 -0400; Some where out there is an SB230 with two 8873s. I had one. <:-)) Of course some one could have just added a second tube, but it looked like it belonged there. OTOH I also had a solid state, 101 tran; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00022.html (17,356 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] 8874? (score: 1): Author: "Hsu" <hsu4qro@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 06:55:18 +0800; Hi, Anyone have experience in 8874/3CX400A7 to GI-7B convation? 73!Hsu _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00028.html (7,736 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] 8874? (score: 1): Author: Glen Zook <gzook@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:16:59 -0700 (PDT); Are you sure the solid-state "HW-101" wasn't the HW-104? That rig was the "el cheapo" version of the SB-104. The "matching" separate VFO for the SB-104 and HW-104 was the SB-644. The SB-230 definitel; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00029.html (8,778 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] 8874? (score: 1): Author: "Fern" <crc@cyberlink.bc.ca>; Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 18:28:25 -0600; Hi Roger: The Heathkit SB-230 used a single 8873 not a pair of them but Henry Radio had a 2K Ultra that used a pair of 8873. Fern -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.; /archives//html/Amps/2009-07/msg00031.html (16,100 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]