Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+4CX1000\s+value\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+4CX1000\s+value\?\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: hs0zed@csloxinfo.com; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 12:58:17 +0700; What would be the likely value for a new sealed zero hours 4CX1000 tube? Thanks Martin, HS0ZED _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.conte; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00120.html (6,977 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:13:44 +0800; They are $410.00 at http://www.vacuumtubes.net/prices.htm so I guess $250 upwards would be a good price. 73, Alek and Sam. VK6APK and VK6/SM3DYU http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6apk http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00123.html (7,892 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 03:57:58 -0400; Those prices are for a tested tube with a guarantee. Tested and guaranteed 8295A's were going for $2400 USD two years ago, while not DOA were running $200-$300. It just depends on how bad some one wa; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00124.html (9,014 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: hs0zed@csloxinfo.com; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:19:03 +0700; Oh, $2400! That sounds a lot, Is the 8295A a special replacement for the 4CX1000? I'd like to get a fair estimate as I have been offered a new sealed in the bag Eimac one and want to offer a fair pri; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00125.html (9,906 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:32:30 +0800; Nah, the 8295A is a pentode. Different animal completely to the 4CX1000. I've given away 4 or 5, 8295A tubes over the last few years. All to worthy homes. 73, Alek. http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6apk http:; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00126.html (11,331 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:36:31 -0400; What does that have to do with a 4CX1000A? Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00127.html (10,555 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:36:27 -0400; That is also a PL-172A and found in the Hallicrafters HT-33A/B. No relationship to the 4CX1000 which was in thousands of Collins 30S1's. Carl KM1H -- Original Message -- From: <hs0zed@csloxinfo.com>; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00128.html (11,548 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:36:35 -0400; Ive seen old USAF NIB surplus as little as $50 at a hamfest with $100-150 being more the norm on internet forums. Tubes are cheap, the socket is usually the killer. Now, with the Chinese providing tu; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00129.html (9,809 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:49:14 -0400; No, it's a Pentode no longer made. I used the large difference between what the tested and guaranteed versions sell for and one that is untested. Unfortunately I worded it poorly. You can purchase g; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00132.html (11,706 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:20:59 -0400; On 5/16/2011 9:36 AM, Carl wrote: That is also a PL-172A and found in the Hallicrafters HT-33A/B. Well...kinda, sorta, almost. They are electrically identical. The PL-172 is listed as a PL-172/8295A; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00134.html (12,959 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:22:57 -0400; Noting. It was an example of the differences between tested with a guarantee, and I think it's good which I phrased poorly. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ Amps mailin; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00135.html (9,183 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>; Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 05:46:41 +0800; There is also the 8432 which is identical in every regard to the 9295A except that the contact ring is smaller and so the SK184 needs to be modified slightly to accommodate this. That also has nothin; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00136.html (14,931 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: Mike Tubby <mike@tubby.org>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 23:00:45 +0100; The 4CX1000/8166 is a fabulous tube ... I have about ten of them here that I acquired 10+ years ago from a broadcast station that closed down... I paid GBP Ł250 for the lot which were mostly pulls bu; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00137.html (16,408 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:11:42 -0400; Especially when Roger gets involved.............. Carl _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00138.html (16,371 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:58:01 -0400; Hey! A little thread drift now and then is a healthy thing...<:-)) 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00139.html (17,357 bytes)
16. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: hs0zed@csloxinfo.com; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:27:05 +0700; Okay guys, think I have it now, and all understood about the different tube types, just sort of made me wonder for a minute. The long and short of this story, I'm offered a 30S-1 as a gift but must b; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00144.html (19,613 bytes)
17. Re: [Amps] 4CX1000 value? (score: 1): Author: "DAVE WHITE" <mausoptik@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 16:40:46 +0100; How about using a Russian GU43B? These are pretty much the same as a 4CX1000 though much, much cheaper. I even have a box of tubes and a few sockets if anyone in the UK (or Germany - I work part time; /archives//html/Amps/2011-05/msg00150.html (19,273 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]