- 1. [Amps] 3-500's tubes (score: 1)
- Author: dan r goddard <cqki8fh@juno.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:45:29 -0500
- When replacing the 3-500's, must there be a burn in period? If so, how long. For a Kenwood TL-922. Thanks Dan _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com htt
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00833.html (6,067 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] 3-500's tubes (score: 1)
- Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:35:43 -0800
- Generally, 24 hours seems to be sufficient. That is what rf parts recommends. 73, Gary... wa6fgi -- Original Message -- From: dan r goddard To: amps@contesting.com Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 2:4
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00834.html (7,070 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] 3-500's tubes (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:34:56 -0800 (PST)
- I ran mine 24 hours -- don't know what it did, but they're still working 3 years later... Joe, N3JI Gary Smith <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Generally, 24 hours seems to be sufficient. That is what r
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00844.html (7,571 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] 3-500's tubes (score: 1)
- Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:06:25 -0800
- I have never ran a new 3-500Z 3-400Z, or 8170 for more than a minute before firing it up. In my experiences, a tube that shows gas on an initial high-pot test is not no more likely to getter itself i
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00849.html (9,082 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Amps] 3-500's tubes (score: 1)
- Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:09:28 -0800
- ... and for good luck at the craps table, one must toss salt over one's shoulder. Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing l
- /archives//html/Amps/2005-02/msg00850.html (7,380 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu