Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+2\s+Tubes\s+in\s+Parrallel\:\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+2\s+Tubes\s+in\s+Parrallel\:\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] 2 Tubes in Parrallel: (score: 1): Author: Bruce Osterberg <n9bx@mchsi.com>; Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:59:49 -0600; From What I read when you have two tubes in Parallel, Like two 3-500 the RL is 1/2 of what it would normally be if one tube was used. Since the good people at Ameritron have shown us the schematics f; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00118.html (7,209 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] 2 Tubes in Parrallel: (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:00:45 -0500; This has been covered any number of times and is archived. In a few words: Handbook obsession with a Q of 12 is meaningless. If you notice the circuits used by many manufacturers over the years they; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00120.html (8,582 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] 2 Tubes in Parrallel: (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 10:31:30 EST; Bruce, your 1300 ohm figure is right on the money. The three Ameritron amplifiers you mention run similar plate currents so the plate load Z will also be similar. The loaded Q might vary a bit from u; /archives//html/Amps/2007-11/msg00125.html (8,002 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]