- 1. [Amps] 1625SS (score: 1)
- Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 06:40:39 -0700
- A few weeks ago, there was some discussion of the 1625. I started reviewing my old QST magazines (my wife thinks keeping them on the book shelf is a waste of space) and found a tube announcement for
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-08/msg00020.html (7,809 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] 1625SS (score: 1)
- Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:19:23 -0400
- Somewhere in my archives (the one between my ears) I remember reading that the ARC -5/SCR series of transmitters were designed in the mid 30's (1937 comes to mind). It wouldnt have been in QST of the
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-08/msg00021.html (9,823 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] 1625SS (score: 1)
- Author: Karl-Arne Markström <sm0aom@telia.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 19:54:47 +0200
- There is a brief story of the ARC-5/SCR-274 command set evolution, with emphasis on the VHF units, in the document http://www.scr-274-n.info/css.pdf from CQ November 1964. Nothing specific was howeve
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-08/msg00022.html (11,492 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] 1625SS (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:52:35 +0200 (CEST)
- Back in the late 60's, there was an article in 73 magazine about ARC and the Command series. I remember they said that the 12A6 was developed for it. I've a feeling that they started with the receive
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-08/msg00026.html (7,406 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Amps] 1625SS (score: 1)
- Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:05:39 -0400
- The 717A was a popular tube for perking up the RF stage of boatanchor receivers as it had the same pinout of the popular RF tubes of the day. It made my old HQ-129X come alive on 10/15M back in the l
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-08/msg00027.html (8,212 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu