Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\[amps\]SB200\s+on\s+6m\s+\&\s+my\s+take\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\[amps\]SB200\s+on\s+6m\s+\&\s+my\s+take\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] [amps]SB200 on 6m & my take (score: 1): Author: Paul Decker <kg7hf@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:48:20 +0000 (UTC); I've started this email three times now... You guys on the list have always been a great help and resource for me. This subject comes up every few months, but JEEZ....what the HELL is the problem w; /archives//html/Amps/2009-03/msg00395.html (8,358 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] [amps]SB200 on 6m & my take (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:13:04 -0400; My first overclock was with my 4 MHz 8086 and I got A 1 MHz OC out of it. The next was with my 6 MHz 80286 ATTACK board & chip & I got an extra 2 Mhz out of that. Did the watercooling route & all th; /archives//html/Amps/2009-03/msg00421.html (8,646 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] [amps]SB200 on 6m & my take (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:28:52 -0400; Typo: It's running at 3.4 GHz, not 3.6 GHz and has been over a year now. Gary KA1J _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/Amps/2009-03/msg00423.html (7,424 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]