Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\[Fwd\:\s+Re\:\s+\[Moon\-net\]\s+4CX250B\s+in\s+P\-P\s+2m\?\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\[Fwd\:\s+Re\:\s+\[Moon\-net\]\s+4CX250B\s+in\s+P\-P\s+2m\?\]\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] [Fwd: Re: [Moon-net] 4CX250B in P-P 2m?] (score: 1): Author: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@onetel.net>; Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 01:42:24 +0100; Oops, I mis-sent this. Forwarding on. Whilst 4CX250A/F are rated more than 4CX250Bs, they are probably less able to take serious abuse. They are not designed for class C, with a grid dissipation of 0; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00812.html (7,025 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] [Fwd: Re: [Moon-net] 4CX250B in P-P 2m?] (score: 1): Author: "kf4yox" <kf4yox@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:54:57 -0500; I find it very hard to believe a pair of 250b's will be even close to clean at 1kw out. At that power lever the control grid is really getting hammered. A pair of 250r's will do about 800 out with 24; /archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00814.html (8,363 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]