Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\*\*\*\s+SPAM\s+\*\*\*\s+Re\:\s+Parasitics\s+\&\s+Filament\s+Sag\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] *** SPAM *** Re: Parasitics & Filament Sag (score: 1)
Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:43:42 +0200 (CEST)
To see it, one converts the R/L suppressor's series R to Rp, its parallel-equivalent resistance -- which is what the anode sees at its VHF self-resonance. . This conversion is not a simple task.< The
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00759.html (8,453 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] *** SPAM *** Re: Parasitics & Filament Sag (score: 1)
Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:08:00 +0200 (CEST)
dull red glow from the resistance-wire on 10m RTTY. Obviously, this can melt the 221C silver-solder we furnish with our retrofit kits the kits-- < That is a soft silver solder, then? A hard silver so
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00814.html (7,861 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] *** SPAM *** Re: Parasitics & Filament Sag (score: 1)
Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 23:51:31 +0200 (CEST)
Whoa Nellie! The way reactances are taught here are: XL) XL=2**f*L where as = 3.14 (for all practical purposes), f= frequency, and L= inductance in henries. Then XL is the reactive component in ohms.
/archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00080.html (8,076 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] *** SPAM *** Re: Parasitics & Filament Sag (score: 1)
Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 23:59:56 +0200 (CEST)
Karl-Arne, I had a different lecturer in the mid 1960's to your Professor, but we had homework to prove all six cases, too! Kept me out of the pub for a little while..... 73 Peter G3RZP _____________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00081.html (7,385 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] *** SPAM *** Re: Parasitics & Filament Sag (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Sawyer" <w3slk@uplink.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:19:03 -0400
Peter said: "Is this a bit clearer?" To some extent but what I and I believe others are looking at is a typical L-R-C type of circuit. Not where you have R in the L branch and R in the C branch. This
/archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00082.html (7,349 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu