Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\"N\"\s+Connector\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\"N\"\s+Connector\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: "Col. Paul E. Cater" <paulecater@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:19:44 -0500; A few weeks ago, there was an excellent thread concerning connectors on one of the forums. I didn't see it mentioned so I was wondering if anyone has tested or subjected the 2-piece "N" connectors to; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00121.html (7,118 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 17:34:29 -0500; They are available from many suppliers. I have been running a "healthy" 1.5 kW through them at 50 MHz for 6 or 7 years without any trouble so far. SWR is typically 1.5:1 but has been over 2:1 with ic; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00124.html (7,810 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:43:22 -0500; I run 1500W on 144, 222 and 400W on 432 thru N connectors. The 1000W AM CARRIER (4000W PEP) 432 military cavity Ive been working on has an N. All Mil Spec US made of course. Carl KM1H They are availa; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00134.html (9,408 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:51:21 -0800; On 12/15/2013 9:19 AM, Col. Paul E. Cater wrote: A few weeks ago, there was an excellent thread concerning connectors on one of the forums. I didn't see it mentioned so I was wondering if anyone has; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00140.html (9,306 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:47:46 -0500; On 12/15/2013 12:19 PM, Col. Paul E. Cater wrote: A few weeks ago, there was an excellent thread concerning connectors on one of the forums. I didn't see it mentioned so I was wondering if anyone has; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00142.html (8,876 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: "Mark Bitterlich" <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:40:45 -0500; I've put 10 KW PEP (SSB) through a standard Milspec N connector attached to RG-393. Also with L44W 1/2" Heliax connectors (solder on center pin as well) . However, this was with a perfect match. And; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00149.html (10,708 bytes)
7. [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: John Lyles <jtml@losalamos.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 20:12:11 -0700; When I came into my current job, there were some cavity amplifiers using RCA 7651 tetrodes, running 5 kW pulsed power, about 600 watts average. This was at 200 MHz. The N connectors on the input to t; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00165.html (9,456 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 05:48:28 -0500; It's interesting that the N connectors would burn up "every so often". Presumably they were always OK when tested immediately after installation, and then failed sometime later. That begins to sound; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00166.html (13,275 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: "Jim Garland" <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>; Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 16:13:06 -0700; I've had bad experience with N connectors on long runs of coax in the wintertime. My theory, unsupported either by other facts or long deliberation is that the coax length shrinks slightly at low tem; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00171.html (16,119 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: "qrv@kd4e.com" <qrv@kd4e.com>; Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 18:36:37 -0500; Couldn't you install a coax strain-relief to eliminate the problem? I've had bad experience with N connectors on long runs of coax in the wintertime. My theory, unsupported either by other facts or l; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00172.html (9,250 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 01:49:21 -0500; Not sure where my answer went so I'll try again. Depending on the coax type/size, put a one or two turn loop at each end. Strain reliefs will not prevent the center conductor migration where a loop w; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00176.html (10,508 bytes)
12. [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 23:56:17 -0800; I've had bad experience with N connectors on long runs of coax in the wintertime. My theory, unsupported either by other facts or long deliberation is that the coax length shrinks slightly at low tem; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00178.html (8,471 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:25:00 -0500; On 12/30/2013 2:56 AM, Jim Thomson wrote: Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 16:13:06 -0700 From: "Jim Garland" <4cx250b@miamioh.edu> To: "'Ian White'" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>, <jtml@vla.com>, <amps@contesting.co; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00187.html (11,796 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:49:02 -0800; different type of N connectors out there.....with and without pasivated center pins. The non pasivated types would allow for the center pin to slide back a tiny bit....when its cold out. Thats when; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00188.html (9,559 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] "N" Connector (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 19:20:27 +0100; Here in Germany 7/16 plugs for 1/2" Cellflex by RFS are 6,91 Euro, those for the more fexible SCF type are 7,19 Euro. In Germany we also use a similar but smaller DIN connector which is type 4.1-9.5; /archives//html/Amps/2013-12/msg00190.html (7,625 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]