Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+volts\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] volts (score: 1)
Author: Peter.Chadwick@gpsemi.com (Peter Chadwick)
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 12:53:20 +0100
idiot It is claimed in many places that the most dangerous voltages are between 400 and 1600 DC, as that usually leads to ventricular fibrillation. Some people claimed that sweep tube linears were sa
/archives//html/Amps/1997-10/msg00029.html (7,644 bytes)

2. [AMPS] volts (score: 1)
Author: Peter.Chadwick@gpsemi.com (Peter Chadwick)
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 17:29:07 +0100
Adding to George's (K6GT) comments, don't assume that because a solid state amp is running 12, 28 or 50 volts, it's safer. I'd suggest, in addition to George's recommendations, the following:- 1. DON
/archives//html/Amps/1997-10/msg00032.html (7,759 bytes)

3. [AMPS] volts (score: 1)
Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 13:51:24 +0100
"Blown clear" is not quite what happens. With the kinds of voltages used in house wiring and amateur radio, there's not enough electrical energy available to propel a human body. The shock causes a v
/archives//html/Amps/1997-10/msg00033.html (8,792 bytes)

4. [AMPS] volts (score: 1)
Author: phil@two-way.demon.co.uk (philip de cadenet)
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 21:41:10 +0100
Ian, This depends on the amount of Kentucky Fried Chicken that was consumed the previous night:-) Phil G4ZOW/M -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Ad
/archives//html/Amps/1997-10/msg00044.html (7,753 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu